Optimizing Performance and Authorship Legitimacy: A Multidisciplinary Approach Integrating Swarm Algorithms, Statistical Linguistics, and Computer Vision
Keywords:
Swarm Algorithms, Statistical Linguistics, Computer Vision, Performance Optimization, Authorship Legitimacy, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, Graph Coloring, Content Authenticity, Optimization TechniquesAbstract
This paper explores the convergence of swarm algorithms, statistical linguistics, and computer vision to enhance performance metrics and assess authorship legitimacy in computational systems. As technology continues to advance at an unprecedented rate, the integration of diverse fields becomes essential for addressing complex challenges in artificial intelligence (AI). Swarm algorithms, inspired by natural systems, offer efficient optimization solutions to a variety of problems, while statistical linguistics provides robust methodologies for analyzing language patterns, critical for verifying authorship. In addition, computer vision plays a crucial role in evaluating performance within AI applications, particularly in scenarios involving image recognition and facial analysis. This research aims to synthesize findings across these domains, identifying innovative methodologies that improve algorithmic performance while addressing the growing concerns around content authenticity. The findings highlight the potential synergies between these areas, paving the way for future advancements in AI applications that are not only efficient but also ethically sound and reliable.
References
1. Saeed, A., Husnain, A., Zahoor, A., & Gondal, R. M. (2024). A comparative study of cat swarm algorithm for graph coloring problem: Convergence analysis and performance evaluation. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science and Technology (IJIRCST), 12(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55524/ijircst.2024.12.4.1
2. Hussain, G., Husnain, A., Zahra, R., & Din, S. M. U. (2018). Measuring authorship legitimacy by statistical linguistic modeling. In 2018 International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS) (pp. 1-7). Lahore, Pakistan. doi: 10.1109/ICACS.2018.8333276.
3. Chen, J. J., Husnain, A., & Cheng, W. W. (2024). Exploring the Trade-Off Between Performance and Cost in Facial Recognition: Deep Learning Versus Traditional Computer Vision. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 823. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47724-9_27
4. Kuo, Y. H., & Yang, K. H. (2022). The application of machine learning in authorship attribution. Journal of Computational Linguistics, 48(1), 111-134.
5. Jain, A., & Gupta, S. (2023). Analyzing the efficacy of swarm intelligence techniques in optimization problems: A survey. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 72, 100907.
6. Ramesh, S., & Leena, B. (2021). Statistical methods for detecting authorship: A review. Journal of Information Science, 47(3), 325-340.
7. Liu, Y., & Wu, X. (2022). Performance evaluation of deep learning models in facial recognition tasks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(7), 4038-4046.
8. Sharma, V., & Kapoor, S. (2021). Comparative study of optimization algorithms in AI applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(4), 302-319.
9. Green, D. D., & Johnson, M. L. (2023). Understanding the limitations of traditional computer vision methods. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(5), 1620-1635.
10. Thomas, H., & Wong, K. (2020). A comprehensive review of swarm intelligence in optimization problems. Soft Computing, 24(5), 3601-3619.
11. Zhang, L., & Li, J. (2022). Advances in computer vision: Deep learning versus traditional methods. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 37(3), 569-586.
12. Wang, F., & Chen, J. (2023). Optimizing performance in AI: A comparative analysis of methodologies. AI Open, 6, 12-25.
13. Alvi, A. A., & Ismail, M. (2021). Evaluating authorship authenticity: Techniques and methodologies. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(2), 347-360.
14. Shankar, A., & Kumar, V. (2023). Novel approaches in facial recognition: A systematic review. Expert Systems with Applications, 208, 118204.
15. Mehta, R., & Singh, A. (2023). Interdisciplinary approaches to authorship verification: A comprehensive overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 14(2), 1-30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AlgoVista: Journal of AI & Computer Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
